South African taxpayers who belong to medical aid schemes are likely to face what experts are now describing as a “triple tax” to fund the National Health Insurance (NHI). They will be required to continue paying their regular taxes, lose access to their medical aid tax credits, and still shoulder the costs of private healthcare services as the government proceeds with its long-term health reform plans. The National Department of Health (NDOH), under the leadership of Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, recently disclosed detailed proposals outlining how it intends to redirect existing taxes and adjust the medical aid tax credit system in order to secure funding for the NHI.
Key Takeaways
- Triple Tax Burden Incoming: South African taxpayers could soon face a triple layer of taxation as the government plans to redirect existing taxes, remove medical aid tax credits, and introduce new payroll and income surcharges to fund the National Health Insurance (NHI).
- Middle-Class Squeeze: The phasing out of medical aid tax credits is expected to hit middle-income households the hardest, with millions likely to reconsider private healthcare as costs rise and affordability declines.
- Uncertain Future for Healthcare: Despite the ambitious NHI funding plans, no official costing or detailed roadmap has been provided, leaving doubts about whether the new system will deliver quality healthcare or simply add to taxpayers’ financial strain.
About Arcadia Finance
Get the funds you need with ease through Arcadia Finance. Compare offers from 19 trusted NCR-accredited lenders and pay no application fees. Fast, transparent, and designed to match your financial goals.
Government Outlines 15-Year Funding Framework
In a presentation to the Standing Committee on Appropriations, the department unveiled a framework aimed at generating sufficient funds over a 15-year period to support the implementation of the NHI. This framework includes the gradual removal of medical scheme tax credits as a key revenue-generating measure.
The proposal highlights several methods through which the government intends to channel resources into the NHI. These include the reallocation of funds from both national and provincial budgets, the discontinuation of medical subsidies for government employees, the redirection of existing medical aid tax credits, the introduction of payroll-based taxes, and the implementation of surcharges on personal income tax.
Tip: Financial planners recommend that taxpayers start reviewing their household budgets now and consult tax experts to understand how the potential removal of medical aid credits might affect their annual tax returns. Preparing early can prevent unexpected shocks when the changes take effect.
Although officials have indicated that the NHI funding model will be phased in gradually, the department has confirmed in multiple forums that the removal of medical aid tax credits is a near-term priority. This confirmation was reiterated in its response to a court case brought forward by the business advocacy group Sakeliga, during which the department maintained that no additional new taxes would be introduced for at least the next 10 to 15 years.
Trivia: South Africa currently has one of the highest tax-to-GDP ratios in Africa, sitting at around 26%, according to the World Bank. Analysts warn that adding even small levies or payroll surcharges could push this ratio closer to that of heavily taxed European nations.
Medical Aid Tax Credits Set to Be Phased Out
Despite this vague timeline, the Department of Health has made it clear that it intends to address the medical aid tax credit issue without delay. Officials have already initiated discussions with the National Treasury to explore how these credits could be systematically reduced and redirected to support the NHI.
According to department representatives, the plan is to phase out the medical aid tax credit gradually by introducing income or eligibility thresholds over time. In effect, this means that fewer people will qualify for these tax rebates as the NHI progresses through its various stages of implementation.
However, consistent with the government’s broader communication on the NHI, much of the information surrounding these plans remains uncertain and contradictory.
Tip: Medical aid members are urged to keep all statements, invoices, and contribution records. These documents could prove crucial in calculating new taxable income levels or claiming deductions during the transitional phases of NHI implementation.
Industry Experts Raise Concerns Over Inconsistencies
Thoneshan Naidoo, Chief Executive Officer of the Health Funders Association (HFA), has pointed out that inconsistencies in the department’s affidavits have already been flagged in court submissions. He explained that earlier versions of the department’s legal filings suggested that only individuals earning around R1 million annually would lose access to medical aid tax credits. In contrast, more recent information indicates that up to one-third of medical scheme members could be affected by this policy change.
The HFA has since filed a series of objections in response to what it views as unclear and shifting positions from the Department of Health.
There are over 8.9 million South Africans currently on medical aid, but fewer than 20% of them fall into the high-income bracket. This means the potential removal of tax credits could disproportionately affect middle-class households, the very group that keeps the private health sector afloat.
No Official Costing for the NHI Yet
Another major concern is the absence of a definitive costing model for the NHI. Official estimates have not been released, leaving analysts to speculate that the programme could require anywhere from R200 billion to as much as R1.3 trillion per year to achieve its objectives, depending on the standard of care the system aims to deliver.
While the Department of Health has rejected the higher end of these projections, it has not offered any concrete alternative figures. Analysts have warned that this uncertainty makes it nearly impossible to assess the fiscal sustainability of the scheme.
If fully implemented, the removal of medical aid tax credits could provide the government with approximately R34 billion in additional annual revenue. However, no assessment has yet been made regarding how many individuals might withdraw from private medical aids due to rising costs, nor how this could impact the already overburdened public healthcare system.
Tip: Economists advise households to avoid cancelling medical aids prematurely in anticipation of the NHI rollout. Many fear that dropping out too early could expose families to major medical risks during a period when the healthcare system is still in transition.
Healthcare in South Africa Already Seen as “Double Tax”
Even before the introduction of the NHI, healthcare in South Africa is widely viewed as a form of “double taxation.” Citizens contribute to the national budget through income tax and value-added tax (VAT), both of which already fund the public healthcare system. For the 2025/26 financial year, the national health budget is projected to reach R296.1 billion, accounting for roughly 11.5% of the total government expenditure.
Due to persistent inefficiencies and poor service delivery in the public healthcare sector, many households are compelled to take out private medical aid policies to ensure access to reliable healthcare. This represents an additional cost to families on top of their tax contributions. Although the government offers a modest tax credit to ease this burden, it only offsets a small portion of the total expense.
Trivia: According to a recent study by Discovery Health, the average South African family spends over 12% of its monthly income on medical aid premiums, far higher than the global average of 6%. The removal of tax credits could push that number closer to 15%, making medical aid unaffordable for millions.
Triple Taxation and Future Financial Strain
Under the new plans, the gradual removal of medical aid tax credits, along with the potential introduction of new taxes such as payroll levies and income surcharges, will effectively result in a third layer of taxation. Money that would have been returned to taxpayers in the form of credits will instead be redirected to the national healthcare system, which already relies heavily on tax-based funding.
In practical terms, this means taxpayers will pay three times over for healthcare: first through their normal income taxes, then through private medical aid contributions, and finally through the loss of tax credits.
Tax specialists suggest that employees earning between R350,000 and R1 million annually should monitor payroll deductions closely, as these taxpayers are the most likely to experience incremental tax adjustments when NHI-linked levies are introduced.
Long-Term Plan Could Eliminate Medical Aids Entirely
The ultimate vision of the NHI is to replace private medical aid schemes with a single, government-managed system that covers all citizens. In theory, this would eliminate the need for medical aid contributions altogether, as healthcare services would be publicly funded.
However, by the time this system becomes fully operational, the government would likely have introduced both payroll taxes and surcharges on income to ensure a stable source of funding for the NHI. This would again place taxpayers in a position where they are paying multiple times to sustain the system: income tax, payroll tax, and income surcharges.
If medical aids are eventually scrapped, South Africa would join countries such as the United Kingdom and Canada, where private healthcare exists alongside universal health systems, but critics argue that South Africa’s governance capacity is far weaker, making such comparisons risky.
Quality of Care Remains Uncertain
Despite these ambitious funding plans, there is still no assurance that the NHI will deliver high-quality, accessible, and efficient healthcare to all citizens. The public healthcare system is currently plagued by mismanagement, staff shortages, and ageing infrastructure, and there are growing doubts about whether additional funding alone will resolve these issues.
If the NHI fails to deliver the promised improvements, South Africans may still feel compelled to seek out private healthcare options, even after being heavily taxed to fund the public system. This could effectively lead to what some analysts have started calling a potential “quadruple tax” scenario, where citizens continue to pay out of pocket for reliable medical services in addition to multiple layers of taxation.
Conclusion
South Africa’s proposed NHI funding model has raised serious concerns about affordability, transparency, and long-term sustainability. While the government claims the initiative will deliver equal access to healthcare for all citizens, the absence of clear costings, conflicting communication, and the looming removal of medical aid tax credits suggest that taxpayers may be left footing a far heavier bill than anticipated. Unless decisive measures are taken to ensure accountability and effective management, the NHI could deepen financial pressure on households while failing to deliver the quality healthcare that South Africans urgently need.
Fast, uncomplicated, and trustworthy loan comparisons
At Arcadia Finance, you can compare loan offers from multiple lenders with no obligation and free of charge. Get a clear overview of your options and choose the best deal for you.
Fill out our form today to easily compare interest rates from 19 banks and find the right loan for you.
