Driving Licence Validity Extension Under Fire from Critics

The prospect of lengthening the validity period of South African driving licence cards has resurfaced, yet labour unions have cautioned that such a shift could undermine government revenue streams and threaten job security within the licensing sector.

Key Takeaways

  • Creecy shows clear support for extending driving licence validity to eight years, reflecting growing pressure from motorists dealing with long queues, booking system failures and ongoing processing delays.
  • Experts believe a longer renewal cycle could generate substantial economic benefits, saving citizens time, transport costs and productivity losses that collectively amount to millions of rand.
  • Certain high-risk vehicle categories may still face more frequent renewals, as road safety groups argue that professional drivers require more regular health and compliance assessments.

Apply for your loan easily with Arcadia Finance. There are no application fees, and you can access offers from 19 reputable NCR compliant lenders. Enjoy a simple process that helps you choose the most suitable option for your circumstances.

Creecy’s Support for Longer Licence Validity Meets Practical and Safety Considerations

Earlier in the month, Transport Minister Barbara Creecy voiced support for the idea of increasing the lifespan of South African driving licence cards to eight years, rather than retaining the existing five-year renewal cycle. Insiders say her stance reflects growing pressure from motorists frustrated by long queues, online booking glitches and chronic processing delays.

When addressing the National Council of Provinces, Creecy indicated that her department regarded the proposal to extend the card validity period as a matter that deserved positive consideration, suggesting it aligned with broader administrative improvements. Analysts add that extending validity could save citizens time, travel costs and lost work hours, which cumulatively amount to millions of rand each year.

However, despite her openness to a general extension, the minister noted that certain categories of vehicles, including commercial buses, long-haul trucks and minibus taxis, might still require more frequent renewals, potentially every two years, due to their different operational demands.

Long History of Debate and Delays

Long History of Debate and Delays

The issue of extending driving licence card validity has circulated in government discussions for several years, with repeated promises to reconsider the policy dating back to former Transport Minister Fikile Mbalula’s time in the portfolio.

Motorists often recall this as one of several major promises by Mbalula that lingered in bureaucratic limbo, generating both public frustration and online comedic commentary.

Mbalula stated in 2022 that the Road Traffic Management Corporation would conduct a comprehensive assessment exploring the feasibility of increasing the validity period to ten years. At the time, many South Africans welcomed the idea, as licence renewal bottlenecks had become notorious nationwide.

Although the study was finalised and later presented to Cabinet, substantial details of its findings emerged only after the appointment of his successor, Sindisiwe Chikunga, during her relatively brief tenure.

Findings Supporting an Extension

By 2024, information released by the department confirmed that the RTMC’s research recommended an extension to an eight-year validity period, supported by data and argued on administrative grounds; however, Chikunga’s leadership eventually reversed the proposal entirely. The reversal stunned policy observers, as it contradicted both the research and widespread public sentiment.

At the time, Chikunga dismissed the extension by offering explanations that many analysts considered implausible, including claims that the renewal cycle was connected to managing broader public health risks and the spread of communicable diseases.

The department insisted that numerous road accidents in South Africa were influenced by health-related issues, and it argued that more frequent eye tests were therefore essential to ensuring road safety.

While eye testing is important, experts say there is limited evidence that shorter renewal periods reduce accident rates.

Critics strongly criticised these justifications, contending that the department’s rejection of the extension and its refusal to endorse the RTMC’s research were rooted in financial concerns rather than public health considerations. Revenue protection, they say, has quietly shaped licensing policy for years.

Renewals as a Revenue Stream

Driving licence card renewals provide substantial income for the Driving Licence Card Account, and reducing renewal frequency would significantly reduce this revenue stream, potentially destabilising the entity’s budget. For context, licence renewals contribute hundreds of millions of rand each year, making the programme a significant financial pillar within the department.

While previous office-holders avoided openly acknowledging this financial dependency, Creecy has now clarified that monetary considerations have indeed been the primary obstacle delaying the policy shift.

Creecy Reaffirms Support but Seeks Full Financial Clarity

Creecy Reaffirms Support but Seeks Full Financial Clarity

Responding to concerns about the department’s stance, Creecy stated that the department had not rejected the idea of extending the validity period but had instead sought to examine the broader implications more closely. She also hinted that the department must carefully manage competing interests between motorists, unions and internal financial structures.

She elaborated that the internal research confirmed that an eight-year validity cycle was technically viable, but such a change would inevitably create financial challenges for certain entities within the department’s structure.

These challenges could be mitigated through alternative revenue streams, digital services or improved operational efficiencies.

Renewal Revenue Loss Could Strain Key Units

Creecy explained that specific units, including the one responsible for producing the physical licence cards, depend heavily on revenue generated through regular renewals, and altering the system would affect their operational funding. This printing unit is known to have ageing equipment, which has historically caused backlogs whenever it experiences mechanical failures.

As a result, she requested a detailed analysis assessing the financial consequences of such a decision, emphasising that it was important for her to fully understand the long-term budgetary implications before making a formal commitment.

The minister stressed that it remained her responsibility to consider all unintended consequences of policy changes carefully, and she was awaiting the results of an updated financial study before proceeding.

Once she receives the final report and evaluates its findings, Creecy intends to make a decision on the matter, confirming that the department will not delay action unnecessarily.

Unions Support Extension but Warn of Revenue Risks

Unions Support Extension but Warn of Revenue Risks

Labour unions have acknowledged the potential economic complications but have still expressed support for increasing the validity period, arguing that it would ultimately benefit South Africans.

The Public Servants Association indicated that it favours a longer validity period and has previously advocated for a ten-year cycle, believing that such a measure could significantly streamline administrative processes.

The union argued that extending the validity of driving licence cards would help improve service delivery, reduce the administrative load on citizens and relieve congestion at licencing centres that frequently experience overwhelming demand.

Additionally, it maintained that a longer renewal period could help reduce backlogs and waiting times, particularly given the department’s dependence on a single ageing and frequently malfunctioning printing machine, which has struggled to meet demand.

However, the PSA cautioned that the department should ensure that the financial implications of the proposed extension are properly addressed and that stability and sustainability are maintained within the system.

The union further stressed that the department must be transparent about the implementation timeline and guarantee that employees working within the licencing environment will not be adversely affected by any changes.

It emphasised the urgency of resolving the matter, citing ongoing backlogs, growing administrative pressures on the Driving Licence Card Account and the difficult economic circumstances faced by many South Africans.

Policy Proposal Still Pending

The Department of Transport had previously signalled its intention to propose an eight-year validity period in its annual performance plan for the 2025 to 2026 financial year, which was published in June 2025. Observers noted this as a promising move, although the timeline has already slipped.

Despite this indication, no formal legislative or administrative proposal has yet been put forward, leaving the policy shift pending and awaiting final evaluation by the minister and her department. As South Africans wait, many hope that the final decision brings relief rather than yet another cycle of delays and uncertainty.

Conclusion

Minister Barbara Creecy’s support for extending the validity of South African driving licence cards signals a potential shift toward a more efficient and citizen-friendly system, though practical and safety considerations remain central to the discussion. While analysts highlight the substantial economic and administrative advantages of a longer renewal cycle, the need for more frequent assessments for high-risk vehicle categories underscores the complexity of implementing such reforms. Ultimately, the proposal’s success will depend on balancing public convenience with road safety priorities and ensuring that the licensing framework remains both sustainable and responsive to the needs of motorists and the broader transport sector.

Fast, uncomplicated, and trustworthy loan comparisons

At Arcadia Finance, you can compare loan offers from multiple lenders with no obligation and free of charge. Get a clear overview of your options and choose the best deal for you.

Fill out our form today to easily compare interest rates from 19 banks and find the right loan for you.

How much do you need?
Repayment period
Monthly repayment
R 211

Over 2 million South African's have chosen Arcadia Finance

*Representative example: Arcadia Finance is an online loan comparison tool and not a credit provider. We partner with Myloan.co.za and only work with NCR-registered credit providers in South Africa. Our comparison service to consumers is free of charge. Estimated repayments on a loan of R30 000 over 36 months at a maximum annual interest rate of 28% would be R1 360 per month including an initiation fee and monthly service fees. Interest rates charged by credit providers may, however, start as low as 11%. Repayment terms can range from 6 to 72 months.
Myloan

We work with Myloan.co.za. A leading loan marketplace in South Africa.